Verfasst: Di Okt 30, 2007 09:28
heisst der nicht bellicheat??? jetzt mal im ernst...piwi-dd hat geschrieben:...Bill Bellichick
Das Forum für American Football
https://footballforum.de/community/
heisst der nicht bellicheat??? jetzt mal im ernst...piwi-dd hat geschrieben:...Bill Bellichick
Genauso wenig wie es Tränen gibt, wenn die Braunschweig Lions nicht als Überteam in Deutschland der letzten Jahre bezeichnet werden...Karsten hat geschrieben:... es gibt doch jetzt hier aber nicht gleich Tränen, weil es ein paar Ketzer wagen, die Patriots nicht für Götter zu halten?
Das war Belicheat, nicht BradySarundus hat geschrieben:Also, hab grad mit Brady telefoniert und er hat mir versichert das die Pats das Duell gewinnen werden.
Außerdem soll ich mich in seinem Namen nochmal bei allen für das Kamera Cheating entschuldigen und versichern, dass es sowohl das erste mal und auch das letzte mal der Fall gewesen ist !!
Gregg Easterbrook hat geschrieben:This Week's Anti-Belichick Item: First, praise where due: No one draws up a better game plan than Belichick. This season, he usually has started with the shotgun spread and lots of quick slants. Belichick correctly guessed Washington would spend the week practicing to defend the shotgun spread and quick slants, so the New England coach opened with Tom Brady under center and the Patriots running up the middle. Sure enough, the Redskins were in a defense tailored to stop slant passing, with their linebackers backed off nearly 10 yards. After several consecutive runs worked, Washington brought its linebackers up, and Brady immediately started throwing slants. Belichick varies his game plan more from week to week than any other NFL coach, and the variations are almost always intelligent and sophisticated. If you wanted to win a game and had to choose a coach, all other things being equal, you'd be nuts not to choose Belichick.
But all other things aren't equal. Last week's TMQ called the Colts the good team and the Patriots the bad team in a "Good vs. Evil" setup for next week's clash. After the column posted, I felt badly that I had not made clear I was being satirical -- that was my failing as a writer -- because, after all, none of us has the slightest idea what is in the hearts of Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. There was Internet chatter calling me biased, ignorant, lower than pond scum; although in 2004 when I wrote a column for NFL.com saying Belichick was not only the best coach of the moment but perhaps the best coach ever, I don't recall anyone calling me biased or uninformed. Anyway, I apologize to Brady for complaining that he smirks -- saying this is an insult, and although it's fine to criticize public figures, insults are childish. (Remember, my argument is not with the New England players, it is with bad sportsmanship and cheating.) I even toyed with apologizing to Belichick, since comparing him to Beelzebub was a tad overloaded. But then I watched Sunday's game and thought, Belichick is exactly what I said!
With 13 minutes remaining, the Patriots led 38-0, yet Brady not only was still on the field but was in the shotgun and still throwing deep. With 12 minutes to play, New England jumped offsides on third-and-2; Brady visibly yelled "f---!" in angry disgust. With his team ahead 38-0! At 11 minutes remaining, Belichick went for it on fourth-and-1, frantically trying to humiliate genteel Joe Gibbs by running up the score. When Brady threw to Wes Welker for yet another touchdown, he celebrated wildly afterward. OK, it's unfair to say Brady smirks. But a true sportsman, or anyone with dignity, would have felt embarrassed about celebrating wildly at 45-0 in the fourth quarter. Matt Cassel came in at quarterback, and immediately began throwing from the shotgun. Belichick went for it on fourth-and-2 with a 45-point lead, and soon the Patriots were celebrating wildly when Cassel ran for a TD himself.
Now it's 52-0 late in the fourth quarter, but Belichick wasn't satisfied. Most defensive starters remained in the game. With four minutes to go, Mike Vrabel was still on the field and Patriots coaches were still calling blitzes. With three minutes to go, Rosevelt Colvin was still on the field and Patriots coaches were still calling blitzes. With 30 seconds remaining, Asante Samuel and many other starters were still on the field, frantically trying to prevent Washington from recording a second consolation touchdown.
You certainly can ask why the Redskins, especially tastefully named Gregg Williams, took their humiliation at New England so passively. If it were 38-0 in the fourth quarter and the other side still had its starting quarterback on the field throwing deep, I would have called a double safety blitz and slammed Brady to the ground; Belichick immediately would have taken the starters out, and the mockery of sportsmanship would have ended. After the game, Colvin and other Patriots players said that in the pros, you should play full-tilt no matter how lopsided the score. If that's true, no one from New England could have complained if Williams had called an all-out blitz to hammer Brady. Why Williams kept calling vanilla defenses in the fourth quarter, passively submitting to being mocked, is something only he knows. But the fact that Washington took its humiliation lying down is no excuse for New England's classless victory. The bad sportsmanship doesn't even make coaching sense -- what if Brady or some other valuable player gets injured during a meaningless fourth quarter running-up-the-score exercise?
Da hab ich aber schon schlimmeres über mich gelesenstörtebeker hat geschrieben:Kurt, wird nicht spannender oder wahrer, je öfter du was postest und wenn man deinen Nachnahmen ständig vorm Finale in "Saulus" geändert hätte, würdest du es wohl auch nicht witzig finden... Ganz schön arm für so 'nen erwachsenen Mann...
Welche denn? Der Sieg über die Jets? Oder die ganze Saison bisher? Oder gar die SB-Siege?KP hat geschrieben:Und dadurch kriegen die Erfolge der Patriots, wie man in Schwaben sagt, ein "Gschmäckle".
Ist doch ganz klar: ALLE Siege der Pats seit 1972 sind nur und ausschließlich durch Betrug, Manipulation, Bestechung etc. zustande gekommenpiwi-dd hat geschrieben:Welche denn? Der Sieg über die Jets? Oder die ganze Saison bisher? Oder gar die SB-Siege?KP hat geschrieben:Und dadurch kriegen die Erfolge der Patriots, wie man in Schwaben sagt, ein "Gschmäckle".
http://www.idiotenapostroph.de.vu/musketeer54 hat geschrieben:Tom Brady's Mutter zieht LKWs auf DSF!